Judge Roy Moore Code|
It ranks right up there with some of the blackest days in U.S. history in the hearts and minds of many evangelical Christians and orthodox Jews.
The day they removed the Ten Commandments monument from the Alabama Judicial Building symbolically ended the era of Judeo-Christian law in the United States, according to Judge Moore. "By subjugating the people of Alabama to the unconstitutional edict by Judge Thompson, that public officials may not acknowledge God, the attorney general and my colleagues have made the fiat opinion of a judge supreme over the text of the Constitution," said Judge Moore in a Wall Street Journal piece August 25 (see full text below) concerning the opinion by a federal judge who ruled against him in the dispute. "By telling the state of Alabama that it may not acknowledge God, Judge Thompson effectively dismantled the justice system of the state."
We have begun a search for codes concerning the events in Alabama. Our first discovery was the name of Judge Moore, ironically a 10-letter ELS that appears only once in the Tanach with a skip of 6,805. It stretches across the last three books of the Hebrew Old Testament. Its contexts are astonishing.
Significantly, the code begins and ends in prayers. It starts in the middle of one by the people of Jerusalem in Nehemiah 9 where they are remembering that God gave them the Ten Commandments and the rest of the Law on Mount Sinai.
At the end of the ELS, the three letters that spell Judge Moore's last name in Hebrew have fascinating contexts, too. The mem is in a portion about gatekeepers, those priests who were charged with watching out for enemy attacks on the city of Jerusalem. Judge Moore has certainly proven himself a faithful gatekeeper, even though he has suffered derision from his peers and the media, and suspension from his duties as chief justice of the Alabama Supreme Court.
Solomon is the central character of the passage where the vav lands, the first letter in 2 Chronicles 1:11. When he hears God's invitation to ask for whatever he wants in verse 10, and he responds with a request for wisdom and knowledge in order to "judge" (in the King James Version) God's people, God honors his request in verse 11.
Another prayer is the context of the final letter of the code, a resh. It is Solomon's great prayer of dedication of the Temple he built for the Lord, the one that also includes the often-quoted line, "If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land." (2 Chronicles 7:14 NIV) In fact, it is in an earlier iteration of a similar line in Solomon's prayer.
The table below tells the story of the contexts in detail.
It is interesting that the day the monument was moved from public display was also the day that Mars made its closest approach to earth in 60,000 years. "The heavens proclaim His righteousness, and all the peoples see His glory." (Psalm 97:6) In the last days, "There will be signs in the sun, moon and stars . . ." (Luke 21:25)
This is the end of the article, but not the end of the story.
From Wayne and Sandy Warmack:
Thought you might find it interesting that the Hebrew spelling you used for Moore is also the Hebrew word for MYRRH, the burial spice.
Code researcher Walt York, author of the codes novel, Hanephilim, The Fallen Ones, discovered the ELS above, which he translates as Judge Moore Was Ashamed. They Slept by the Law. Moshe Shak translates the same ELS a little differently: Shame on the Judgment, (says) Moore. They Close Their Eyes When it Comes to Religion.
Walt later amended his earlier translation to read, Judge Moore Shamed the Judicial as They Turned a Blind Eye at the Law. Roy Reinhold offered a different translation of the same Hebrew phrase, The Cause and Evidence of Moore was Shamed; They were Drowsy/Sleepy in the Law.
Here is the text of the Commentary by Judge Moore that appeared in the Wall Street Journal.
ENDOWED BY OUR CREATOR
In God I Trust
Why I'm standing up for the Ten Commandments in Alabama.
BY ROY S. MOORE
Monday, August 25, 2003
MONTGOMERY, Ala.--The battle over the Ten Commandments monument I brought into Alabama's Supreme Court is not about a monument and not about politics. (The battle is not even about religion, a term defined by our Founders as "the duty we owe to our creator and the manner for discharging it.") Federal Judge Myron Thompson, who ordered the monument's removal, and I are in perfect agreement on the fact that the issue in this case is: "Can the state acknowledge God?"
Those were the precise words used by Judge Thompson in his closing remarks in open court. Today, I argue for the rule of law, and against any unilateral declaration of a judge to ban the acknowledgment of God in the public sector.
We must acknowledge God in the public sector because the state constitution explicitly requires us to do so. The Alabama Constitution specifically invokes "the favor and guidance of Almighty God" as the basis for our laws and justice system. As the chief justice of the state's supreme court I am entrusted with the sacred duty to uphold the state's constitution. I have taken an oath before God and man to do such, and I will not waver from that commitment.
By telling the state of Alabama that it may not acknowledge God, Judge Thompson effectively dismantled the justice system of the state. Judge Thompson never declared the Alabama Constitution unconstitutional, but the essence of his ruling was to prohibit judicial officers from obeying the very constitution they are sworn to uphold. In so doing, Judge Thompson and all who supported his order, violated the rule of law.
Alabama Attorney General Bill Pryor and my fellow justices have argued that they must act to remove the monument to preserve the rule of law. But the precise opposite is true: Article VI of the Constitution makes explicitly clear that the Constitution, and the laws made pursuant to it, are "the supreme Law of the Land." Judge Thompson and the judges of the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals have all sworn oaths which bind them to support the Constitution as it is written--not as they would personally prefer it to be written.
By subjugating the people of Alabama to the unconstitutional edict by Judge Thompson, that public officials may not acknowledge God, the attorney general and my colleagues have made the fiat opinion of a judge supreme over the text of the Constitution. While agreeing with me that the Constitution is supreme, and that the opinion of Judge Thompson was contrary to the Constitution, the attorney general has argued that he must follow an order he himself believes to be in direct violation of the supreme law of the land.
One of the great influences on the Founding Fathers, common law sage William Blackstone, once pointed out that judges do not make laws, they interpret them. No judge has the authority to impose his will on the people of a state, and no judge has the constitutional authority to forbid public officials from acknowledging the same God specifically mentioned in the charter documents of our nation, the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution.
My decision to disregard the unlawful order of the federal judge was not civil disobedience, but the lawful response of the highest judicial officer of the state to his oath of office. Had the judge declared the 13th Amendment prohibition on involuntary slavery to be illegal, or ordered the churches of my state burned to the ground, there would be little question in the minds of the people of Alabama and the U.S. that such actions should be ignored as unconstitutional and beyond the legitimate scope of a judge's authority. Judge Thompson's decision to unilaterally void the duties of elected officials under the state constitution and to prohibit judges from acknowledging God is equally unlawful.
For half a century the fanciful tailors of revisionist jurisprudence have been working to strip the public sector naked of every vestige of God and morality. They have done so based on fake readings and inconsistent applications of the First Amendment. They have said it is all right for the U.S. Supreme Court to publicly place the Ten Commandments on its walls, for Congress to open in prayer and for state capitols to have chaplains--as long as the words and ideas communicated by such do not really mean what they purport to communicate. They have trotted out before the public using words never mentioned in the U.S. Constitution, like "separation of church and state," to advocate, not the legitimate jurisdictional separation between the church and state, but the illegitimate separation of God and state.
The First Amendment says that "Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." It does not take a constitutional scholar to recognize that I am not Congress, and no law has been passed. Nevertheless, Judge Thompson's order states that the acknowledgment of God crosses the line between the permissible and the impermissible and that to acknowledge God is to violate the Constitution.
Not only does Judge Thompson put himself above the law, but above God, as well. I say enough is enough. We must "dare defend our rights" as Alabama's state motto declares. No judge or man can dictate what we believe or in whom we believe. The Ninth and 10th Amendments are not a part of the Constitution simply to make the Bill of Rights a round number. The Ninth Amendment secured our right as a people. The 10th guaranteed our right as a sovereign state. Those are the rules of law.
Mr. Moore is the chief justice of the Supreme Court of Alabama.
Reprinted from The Wall Street Journal © 2003 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All rights reserved. Used by permission.
Enjoy finding your own Bible codes.
Bible code search software is available in our online store.
By signing up to be a member of The Isaac Newton Bible Research Society, you will have access to more than fifteen years of research by our team of Bible code researchers.
Sign up to be a member today.
and sign up to receive Bible Code Digest with no cost or obligation.
Code Skeptics' Arguments Trashed
Ever since the first Bible codes were announced, skeptics have been saying, "Oh, well, you can also find codes like that in books like War and Peace and Moby Dick."
We took the time to examine this notion and the best example of it that the skeptics have been able to come up with. The results of our research have completely blown away their theory.
Click here to see for yourself.
NEW: Second Study Undermines
Skeptics' Main Objection
Click here for report